Print this page. One sheet per student, single-sided, 100% scale, no "fit to page".

Human in the Loop: Expectations in the Agentic AI Era

CS 4535: Software Design & Delivery | Panel watch party | Wed Nov 4, 2026

Name:

Fill this in while you watch, in dark pen. In the middle column, write down a claim a panelist makes, with their name. In the right column, test it against your own semester: your first ticket, a review you gave or got, Game Day 1, or the R11 and R12 presentations on Oct 28. Disagreeing with a panelist is fine, as long as you name the moment that makes you disagree.

The panel's question What a panelist said Your evidence: does it match what happened to you?
1. Which professional fundamentals have become more important? Pick one they name. Where did you need it this semester, and did you have it? Who:
2. Where do new graduates fall short when an AI system writes the first draft? Name a time an agent's draft got past you, or a time you caught one in review. Who:
3. What should curricula stop doing to make room for other competencies? One thing this course does that the panel would cut. One thing it doesn't do that they'd add. Who:
4. What should a student starting a degree today do differently? What would you tell yourself in your first year? Is it what the panel said? Who:
5. Where does the panel disagree, with each other or with the evidence? Two panelists who said different things, or a claim that R11 or R12 contradicts. Who:
A question you'd ask the panel (one sentence, specific enough that a yes or no doesn't answer it)